TL;DR
Get everyday helpers delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
A Sixty and Me essay recommends reconsidering “I’ll try,” “can’t,” “always,” “never,” “if only” and “but,” arguing that habitual language can shape self-talk and relationships. The piece offers alternative phrasing but does not present research proving that avoiding these words produces particular outcomes.
Sixty and Me published a first-person essay advising readers to rethink six familiar words and phrases—“I’ll try,” “can’t,” “always,” “never,” “if only” and “but.” The writer argues that habitual language can affect self-talk, motivation and relationships, while presenting the suggestions as personal guidance rather than findings from a cited study.
The essay’s writer describes words as influential in daily life and draws on personal experiences to explain the advice. One example concerns a friend whose fiancé, aware of her difficult family history, reportedly removed the word “divorce” from his dictionaries as a gesture of reassurance. The writer says the couple remain married more than 40 years later; the story is offered as an illustration, not evidence that changing vocabulary caused that outcome.
The other examples focus on phrases the writer believes can encourage discouragement or shift responsibility. In discussing her adult son Joel, who has Down syndrome, she recounts that he lost 35 pounds over six months after the family began taking daily walks and changed some routines during the pandemic. When he says “I’ll try” about continuing those habits, she encourages him to say “I will” instead. This is her account of his experience, not a general health recommendation.
For “can’t,” the writer suggests distinguishing an inability from a choice or an unmet goal. She says “I didn’t get out for my walk today” is more honest than “I can’t get to my walk.” She also cautions that “always” and “never” can turn specific complaints into sweeping judgments. For “if only,” she proposes a forward-looking alternative: “Since this is here, I have a new opportunity.”
How Everyday Phrases Shape Conversations
The essay’s practical point is that small changes in wording can alter how a person frames a setback or speaks to someone else. Replacing “You always” or “You never” with a description of a specific incident may make a complaint less sweeping. Rephrasing an apology can also affect whether it sounds like an acceptance of responsibility or an excuse.
The article frames these ideas as prompts for reflection, not rules that apply in every circumstance. Words such as “can’t” can accurately describe genuine limits, and “but” is not inherently harmful. The useful question raised by the essay is whether a phrase communicates what a speaker means—or has become an automatic way to criticize, excuse or dismiss.
Popular right now
Vitamix Propel Series 750 Professional-Grade Blender, 4 Programs, Black
Ninja Foodi Smart Dual Heat Air Fry Oven, 13-in-1, Silver (SP351)
Bose QuietComfort True Wireless Earbuds with Active Noise Cancellation, Black
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
The Essay’s Personal Language Advice
The article begins with the writer’s recollection of a supportive act in a long marriage, then describes a coaching exercise on “limiting beliefs” and affirmations. The writer says she and a distant partner spoke regularly for seven years to share affirmations and encouragement, and that they saw progress in their personal and professional lives as they changed their language.
The piece also mentions the writer’s decision to limit swearing, partly because she wanted to use more creative language and partly because she noticed that children repeated what adults said. Its six-word list grows out of this personal approach. The source offers anecdotes and opinions; the supplied material includes no study, expert interview or measured comparison establishing the effects of avoiding the phrases.
What the Essay Does Not Establish
The source material does not provide a publication date, research citations or outside expert comment. It is therefore unclear whether the advice reflects a wider evidence-based intervention or the writer’s own experience and interpretation. The essay also does not define when a phrase such as “can’t” reflects a real constraint rather than a habit.
The account of Joel’s weight loss describes changes that happened during the same period but does not establish that any single routine caused the result. The article does not offer clinical guidance, and its personal account should not be treated as a model for managing another person’s health.
Readers Can Test Their Own Phrases
The essay closes by asking readers to notice the words they would be happier not saying and to try alternatives they choose deliberately. It does not announce a follow-up study, program or further reporting. Readers can take the list as a reflection exercise while keeping in mind that the article’s claims about effects are personal observations, not tested conclusions.
Key Questions
Which six words and phrases does the essay identify?
They are “I’ll try,” “can’t,” “always,” “never,” “if only” and “but.” The essay treats “I’ll try” and “if only” as phrases, rather than single words.
Does the article prove that avoiding these phrases improves relationships?
No. The source presents personal stories and advice, but the supplied material includes no research or measured results establishing that avoiding the phrases improves relationships or personal outcomes.
What does the writer suggest saying instead of “if only”?
The writer offers “Since this is here, I have a new opportunity” as a way to focus on what can be done in the present rather than dwelling on an alternative past.
Is “can’t” always a limiting phrase?
The essay argues that “can’t” can sometimes hide a choice or an unmet goal. It does not establish that the word is always misleading; people may also use it to describe genuine limits or circumstances.
Source: sixtyandme.com
