TL;DR
Get everyday helpers delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
A MedPage Today review examines “You Can See Everything,” a nearly three-hour film by Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim that follows Elizabeth Holmes and her partner, Billy Evans, shortly before her prison sentence began. The reviewer praises its unusual form and entertainment value while noting Holmes continues to deny wrongdoing and the film leaves key questions unresolved.
MedPage Today published a four-star review of “You Can See Everything,” a 174-minute film in which directors Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim document Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes and her partner, Billy Evans, in the weeks before Holmes was due to begin an 11-year federal prison sentence. The reviewer describes the film as an unusual, entertaining portrait that does not resolve the central uncertainty around Holmes: she continues to say she did nothing wrong.
The review says Holmes and Evans invited the crew into their rented beachside cottage in Del Mar, California, 34 days before Holmes was due to enter prison. They said they wanted to help the public understand Holmes, arguing that journalists and screen portrayals, including Hulu’s “The Dropout,” had misrepresented her. The film follows the couple with their two young children during that period.
Fielder, known for comedy projects that blur documentary and fiction, is both a director and an on-screen presence. According to the review, he asks Holmes and Evans persistent questions about their relationship and their accounts of events, and allows pauses to remain on screen. The reviewer says the film is difficult to classify and that Fielder’s questioning makes him a guide for viewers, despite his not presenting himself as a journalist or science expert.
Holmes maintains that she did nothing wrong and that the Theranos device, which was intended to run tests using small blood samples, worked. The reviewer notes that Holmes tells Fielder she has never told a lie. That statement is her own assertion, not an independent finding. The film also revisits a disputed quotation attributed to Holmes in a 2023 New York Times profile: “They’re not playing me. They’re playing a character I created.” Holmes and Evans say the quote is not hers and allege it was misquoted; the Times stands by its reporting, the review says.
A Film About Holmes’s Public Image
The film’s subject is not only Holmes’s impending imprisonment but also the competing versions of her story: her own account, media portrayals and the record of the Theranos case. The review presents the tension between what Holmes says and what the audience knows about her conviction as a defining feature of the documentary, rather than as a dispute the film settles.
That distinction matters because Holmes’s statements about her conduct and the company’s technology remain claims attributable to her. The film gives viewers access to her household and conversations, but access does not by itself establish that her account is accurate. The reviewer’s assessment is that even after nearly three hours, Holmes remains enigmatic.
The review also points to Evans as a significant presence. Fielder questions the couple’s account of how they met and moments in which Evans appears to take charge of situations. The reviewer describes their exchanges as puzzling and suggests that being filmed together may not produce the public-relations effect the couple intended. Those are the review’s interpretations of scenes, not findings about the couple’s private relationship.
Popular right now
Dyson V8 Cyclone Cordless Vacuum
Ninja Foodi 10-Quart DualZone 6-in-1 Air Fryer, Black, DZ302
Vitamix Propel Series 510 Professional-Grade Blender, 3 Programs, Black
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
The Weeks Before Prison
Holmes founded Theranos, a blood-testing company whose device was promoted as capable of detecting a range of conditions from a few drops of blood. She was convicted of conspiracy and fraud and, according to the review, was due to serve an 11-year sentence in federal prison. The source does not provide further details about the conviction or the schedule beyond the film’s timing.
Holmes and Evans told the filmmakers they wanted to correct what they viewed as inaccurate portrayals of Holmes. The film’s disagreements over the New York Times quotation provide one example: the couple say the published wording is wrong and that they recorded the conversation, but they do not let Fielder hear that recording. The Times, as reported in the review, continues to stand by its account.
Fielder shares directing credit with Oppenheim. The film is an A24 release, is rated R for “language and some graphic nudity,” and runs 174 minutes. The reviewer awarded it four stars out of four and says familiarity with Holmes is not necessary to find it compelling.
““I’ve never told a lie.””
— Elizabeth Holmes, as described in the MedPage Today review
Disputed Accounts and a Kept Secret
The review says the film has a secret that its filmmakers and studios are trying to keep from audiences, but it does not disclose what that is. Its nature and effect on the film’s reception therefore remain unknown from the source material.
The disputed New York Times quotation is also unresolved in the review: Holmes and Evans say it was misattributed, while the newspaper stands by its reporting. The couple’s account that they recorded the conversation is reported, but they do not let Fielder listen to the recording, so the film does not present that recording as evidence.
More broadly, the review does not establish whether Holmes’s claims about the Theranos device or her conduct are true. It describes what she says and how the film stages the conversation; it does not offer a new technical assessment or legal finding.
Theatrical Release and Audience Response
“You Can See Everything” is in theaters, according to the review, which identifies it as an A24 release. The review does not give a release calendar, box-office figures or details of planned streaming distribution, so those next steps cannot be confirmed here.
The reviewer says it remains to be seen how long the film’s undisclosed secret stays hidden and whether audience interest turns it into a major cinematic event. For now, the confirmed assessment in the source is the review itself: a four-star recommendation for a long, unconventional film that raises questions about its subjects without settling the competing accounts.
Key Questions
What is “You Can See Everything” about?
The film follows Elizabeth Holmes and Billy Evans in their home with their two young children shortly before Holmes was due to begin serving an 11-year federal prison sentence. It was directed by Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim.
What does the review say about the film?
The MedPage Today reviewer calls it unusual, entertaining and difficult to categorize, and awards it four stars out of four. The film runs 174 minutes.
Does Holmes admit wrongdoing in the film?
No such admission is reported in the review. It says Holmes maintains she did nothing wrong and that the Theranos device worked. Those are Holmes’s claims, not conclusions established by the film review.
Is the quotation attributed to Holmes in the New York Times disputed?
Yes. Holmes and Evans say the 2023 profile’s quotation, “They’re not playing me. They’re playing a character I created,” does not sound like her and allege she was misquoted. The review says The New York Times stands by its reporting.
What is the secret the review mentions?
The review does not reveal it. It says the filmmakers and studios are trying to keep a secret from audiences, but provides no details about what it is or how it affects the film.
Source: medpagetoday.com
